More Regulation or Better Stewardship?

20 July 2012

Sarah Wilson

Latest News

Australia narrows climate reporting scope mid‑rollout

Minerva Proxy Update

Follow This challenges Shell days before key vote

SRD III is Europe’s chance to fix proxy plumbing

SEC Steps Closer to Unwinding Climate Disclosure Rules

Minerva Proxy Update

Featured Briefings

Australia Proxy Season Review 2025

2026 Proxy Season Preview

Diversity Divergence: Shareholders Steadfast Amid Pervasive Political Posturing

Optimising the Means and Ends of Good Governance

Manifest is proud to sponsor the 4th Cambridge International Regulation and Governance Conference on September 6th, at Queens College, Cambridge.

In a timely intervention given recent consultations at national and supra-national level on both sides of the Atlantic touching on stewardship processes, the conference will address regulatory responses to aspects of the global financial crisis. Reviews of UK and European corporate governance suggest poor governance is partly to blame. Some reforms have been instigated already but to what effect? How should the interests of consumers, private and public bodies, government and regulators be balanced in the short, medium, long, and indeed very long term? Are good stewardship and innovation on balance promoted by more regulation or hindered by it, nationally and internationally?

The guest speaker is a preeminent figure in corporate governance: Sir Adrian Cadbury. Other key speakers include: Peter Montagnon, UK Financial Reporting Council; Marie Laure Djelic, ESSEC Business School, France; Graham Russell, UK Govt. Dept. of Business Innovation & Skills; Alan Hughes, Whitechapel Bell Foundry Ltd., (est. 1570); Brian Cheffins, University of Cambridge.

The conference will consist of ten plenary and parallel sessions on topics of relevance to understanding the regulation and governance issues that have come to the fore with the global financial crisis. These include: Corporate governance, regulation and ownership; Boards: composition, performance and pay; Regulating the financial sector; Shareholders: power and protection; Regulating and managing business for the long term; Comply-or-explain: reaching the limits of flexibility in corporate governance codes?

To find out more and reserve your place, click on the picture above.

 

Related Stories

Regulating the Raters: The FCA’s ESG Regulatory Proposals, Minerva’s Response, and What the Market Should Watch

April 16, 2026
Read More

Germany Eases Pressure on Investor Collaboration

April 15, 2026
Read More

ExxonMobil’s Retail Voting Programme, Texas Redomicile and the Architecture of Shareholder Disempowerment

April 13, 2026
Read More

Disney Defeat: Anti-ESG Proposal Pair Perform Poorly at 2026 AGM

March 27, 2026
Read More

Your Vote, Their Permission: Why Shareholder Proposal Rights in the US Are Under Existential Threat

March 20, 2026
Read More

ExxonMobil: Redomicile, Proposal Control and the Re‑shaping of Shareholder Influence

March 13, 2026
Read More