New York City pension funds proxy access campaign success

5 June 2016

Editor

Latest News

Australia narrows climate reporting scope mid‑rollout

Minerva Proxy Update

Follow This challenges Shell days before key vote

SRD III is Europe’s chance to fix proxy plumbing

SEC Steps Closer to Unwinding Climate Disclosure Rules

Minerva Proxy Update

Featured Briefings

Australia Proxy Season Review 2025

2026 Proxy Season Preview

Diversity Divergence: Shareholders Steadfast Amid Pervasive Political Posturing

US investors passed the first shareholder resolution in a decade at ExxonMobil when they voted to back the proxy access resolution at its recent AGM. The non-binding resolution called for the oil company to give investors that have jointly held at least 3% of its common stock for at least three years the ability to nominate directors using the corporate ballot.

The resolution was filed by the New York City Pension Funds and received 61.9% preliminary support. Scott Stringer, the New York City Comptroller said, “Investors have sent a message that they want a meaningful voice in electing who sits on ExxonMobil’s board. This vote is the signal event of the proxy season and a watershed moment for ExxonMobil’s shareowners. If this company is to properly address fundamental long-term risks like climate change, its board of directors must be diverse, independent, and accountable. I urge the board to move quickly, engage directly with shareowners, and enact proxy access.”

For the past 18 months the New York City Pension Funds have been engaging in a campaign called the Boardroom Accountability Project to improve the rights of investors to nominate directors. Since that time Stringer said that more than 215 US companies have enacted meaningful proxy access bylaws, including other energy companies, such as Chevron, Conoco Philips, Occidental Petroleum, Anadarko Petroleum, and EOG Resources. Many companies have also voluntarily enacted proxy access without the need for a vote, including more than 70% of the 72 companies that received proposals from the New York City Pension Funds for the 2016 proxy season.

The ExxonMobil board had urged shareholders to vote against the resolution. The company had argued that the proposal risked undercutting the critical role that its independent board affairs committee played in ensuring that, through well-established, rigorous processes, the board is comprised of personnel with required skills, backgrounds and competencies and that the calibre and effectiveness of the board could be diminished over time.

Related Stories

Minerva Analytics Files Texas Public Information Act Request as State Escalates Campaign Against Proxy Advisors

September 18, 2025

home

Read More

From Super-Voting to Equal Voting: Lyft’s Class B Share Conversion

September 12, 2025

Editor

Read More

The White House Loyalty Scorecard: Blurring the Lines Between State and Market

September 11, 2025

Editor

Read More

Double Trouble: US Tech Firm’s Bundled Proposal Targets DCSS Extension

August 6, 2025

Jack Grogan-Fenn

Read More

Poor Performance: France’s AMF Details Asset Managers Regulatory Shortcomings

July 15, 2025

Jack Grogan-Fenn

Read More

Stewardship Under Siege: Minerva CEO Criticises Regulatory Attacks on Proxy Advisors

June 24, 2025

Jack Grogan-Fenn

Read More